Successions
Translation generated by AI. Access the original version
Claim for damages and losses due to the exclusive and exclusive use of the hereditary property
The Supreme Court (TS) has resolved a fairly typical case in “stuck” inheritances , when an inheritance has not yet been distributed has not been divided shared ownership shared ownership Here, two daughters of the deceased
sued the widow sued the widow exclusively using a house that was part of the hereditary estate. What they were claiming was not that she left the house left the house sum based on the market rent market rent that —according to their argument— they could have obtained if the house had been rented out instead of being occupied. And they requested it for themselves, in their own name.
Both the court and the Provincial Court told them no , that they were missing "active legitimacy" active legitimation confirms that idea and explains it clearly, as long as the inheritance community inheritance community claim for themselves fruits , returns, or damages derived from the inheritance assets, because that affects the whole affects the whole Furthermore, the Supreme Court reminds that the Civil Code provides that certain adjustments between heirs (received fruits, expenses, and damages due to misconduct)
be dealt with "in the partition" . In disputes regarding donations and inheritances, our professionals can advise you on the defense of your claims and rights.
In disputes regarding donations and inheritances, our professionals can advise you on the defense of your claims and rights.

This website uses both its own and third-party cookies to analyze our services and navigation on our website in order to improve its contents (analytical purposes: measure visits and sources of web traffic). The legal basis is the consent of the user, except in the case of basic cookies, which are essential to navigate this website.